Question:
Will there be a briefing session that interested suppliers can attend?

Answered on 02/Jul/2025 12:54 PM:


No, there will be no briefing session held at this stage for the project from the department.

Question:
Dear Valerie,

We are currently preparing a response in relation to the Regional Zoning Scenario Model ITO.

Regarding RTM Mandatory Requirement 79, We do not currently hold ISO/IEC 27001 certification. However, we maintain the following cybersecurity credentials:

• CyberEssentialsPlus certification;

• An in-house Security Operations Centre (SOC); and

• Our data centres are hosted and managed by a third party with ISO/IEC 27001 certification.

Could you please confirm whether these controls and certifications would be considered sufficient to meet the requirements of Mandatory Requirement 79, or if additional measures or certifications would be necessary to achieve compliance?

Thanks in advance.

Answered on 09/Jul/2025 02:34 PM:


Please see Addendum 1 for the response to this question.

Question:
1. Section 4.2.1 describes the expected modelling capability.

a. Is the detailed method and logic of the model expected to be proposed by the Supplier, co-developed with the Supplier or does the Department come with a preferred detailed definition of the method to be implemented?

b. Could the relationship between the Regional Zoning Scenario Model and MULTI be explained in more detail?

c. Could a more detailed breakdown of the expected Regional Zoning Scenario Model inputs be provided? E.g. what is the expected column data to be included in the parcel, zoning and planned densities tables described in section 4.3.2?

2. Section 4.3.3 mentions beta pilot releases for LGAs.


a.What level of stakeholder engagement is expected from the Supplier with these LGAs?

b.Is the Supplier expected to conduct any other stakeholder engagement during this project, e.g. with other state government agencies?

3. Requirement FR3.5, FR3.6 and FR3.7 says that a study area may consist of one or more parcels. What is the envisioned upper limit of a study area? How many parcels or how large areas?

Answered on 15/Jul/2025 03:55 PM:


Thank you for submitting questions for clarification, the department has posted their responses in document DSDIP-4896-25 - Addendum 02 which was just uploaded to VendorPanel.

Question:
Given the first UAT period is 12 weeks from kick off will the scope of the first UAT period be to convince stakeholders of the platforms strategic and operational use case or to help provide feedback on the tool's functional performance. Additionally, does Government think that the policy data will be ready by this milestone.

Answered on 15/Jul/2025 03:55 PM:


Thank you for submitting a question for clarification, the department has posted their response in document DSDIP-4896-25 - Addendum 02 which was just uploaded to VendorPanel.

Question:
Will the capacity modelling in the proposed platform be interacting with the MULTI platform in any way or is it a separate product which will take the inputs of this system?

Answered on 15/Jul/2025 03:55 PM:


Thank you for submitting a question for clarification, the department has posted their response in document DSDIP-4896-25 - Addendum 02 which was just uploaded to VendorPanel.

Question:
Will this proposed platform be in charge of calculating the baseline capacity model or is that being done by government and to be published into this platform.

Answered on 15/Jul/2025 03:56 PM:


Thank you for submitting a question for clarification, the department has posted their response in document DSDIP-4896-25 - Addendum 02 which was just uploaded to VendorPanel.

Question:
Hi

1. Given the focus is on ultimate land supply capacity, please confirm if modelling the expected timing of developments as per the MGR would still be desired?

2. Addendum No.01- question 3 suggested Building Footprint data can be provided. Please confirm if this dataset has complete coverage across the region and if building height values or any other attribute data is included?

3. Could the expectations around 3D capabilities be clarified in more detail? E.g. what specific data or aspects of the planning policy is expected to be rendered in 3D?

4. Could all the factors (e.g. listed overlays) considered by the Department when producing ‘developable area’ for parcels be detailed? This would clarify what additional constraints we may need to consider in our scenario model.

Answered on 15/Jul/2025 03:56 PM:


Thank you for submitting questions for clarification, the department has posted their responses in document DSDIP-4896-25 - Addendum 02 which was just uploaded to VendorPanel.