Insurance - Do you currently hold Public Liability & Products Liability (AUD 20M per occurrence)

Insurance - Do you currently hold Professional Indemnity Insurance (AUD 5M per claim, AUD 10M aggregate annually)

Insurance - Do you currently hold Motor Vehicle Insurance (Comprehensive, Third-party AUD 20M, CTP mandatory)

Insurance - Do you currently hold Cyber Liability Insurance (AUD 2M minimum)

Are you tenderering for the supply of Engineering Services - Acoustic

If Yes, are you a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) - BEng / CPEng - Post-graduate qualification in acoustics.

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of Engineering Services - Fire

If Yes, are you a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) - Fire Engineer - BEng / CPEng

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of Engineering Services - Building Services

If Yes, are you a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) - Civil or Mechanical Engineer - BEng / CPEng

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of Passive Fire Inspector Services

If Yes, do you Hold current Fire Protection-passive stream occupational licenses in relevant passive fire systems.

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of Engineering Services - Geotechnical

If Yes, are you a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) - Geotechnical Engineers - BEng / CPEng

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of Engineering Services - Hydraulic

If Yes, are you a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) - Civil or Mechanical Engineering – BEng / CPEng - Post-graduate qualification in Hydraulic design

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of Engineering Services - Mechanical

If Yes, are you a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) - Mechanical Engineers - BEng / CPEng

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of Engineering Services - Structural Civil

If Yes, are you a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ) - Structural/Civil Engineers - BEng / CPEng

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of investigative and inspectorate services for defective building work - Construction

If Yes Holder of a QBCC Contractor’s Licence (QBCC Builders Licence) with no infringements or directions issued upon any licence held

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of investigative and inspectorate services for defective building work - Fire Inspection

If Yes Holder of a QBCC Contractor’s Licence (Fire protection – passive stream occupational licences and inspect and test ) with no infringements or directions issued upon any licence held

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of investigative and inspectorate services for defective building work - Painting

If Yes Holder of a QBCC Contractor’s Licence (Painting and Decorating license Cement Render) with no infringements or directions issued upon any licence held

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of investigative and inspectorate services for defective building work - Plumbing and Drainage

If Yes Holder of a QBCC Contractor’s Licence (Certificate III in Plumbing CPC40912 Part 2 – Mechanical services – plumbing occupational licence or Certificate III in Plumbing (Mechanical Services) (with sanitary stream completed) CPC32513 CPC32413 plus the following the units of competency from the Certificate IV in Plumbing and Services CPC40912, Carry out work-based risk control process CPCPCM4011A, Estimate and cost work CPCPCM4012A, Design and size sanitary drainage systems CPCPDR4011B, Design and size stormwater drainage systems CPCPDR4012B, Design and size domestic treatment plant disposal systems CPCPDR4013B, Design and size sanitary plumbing systems CPCPSN4011B, Design and size heated and cold-water services and systems CPCPWT4011B and Establish legal and risk management requirements of small business BSBSMB401.) with no infringements or directions issued upon any licence held

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of investigative and inspectorate services for defective building work - Refrigeration Air Conditioning and Mechanical

If Yes Holder of a QBCC Contractor’s Licence (Part 3 – Mechanical services – air-conditioning and refrigeration occupational licence and any one of the following: an apprenticeship in refrigeration and air conditioning; UEE51211 - Diploma of Air-conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering; Certificate III in Engineering - Mechanical Trade MEM30205; Certificate III in Air Conditioning and Refrigeration UEE32211) with no infringements or directions issued upon any licence held

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of investigative and inspectorate services for defective building work - Roof Metal

If Yes Holder of a QBCC Contractor’s Licence (an apprenticeship in plumbing and drainage, carpentry or carpentry and joinery; or Certificate III in Roof Plumbing CPC32612 CPC32620 or Certificate III in Carpentry CPC30220) with no infringements or directions issued upon any licence held

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of investigative and inspectorate services for defective building work - Roof Tile

If Yes Holder of a QBCC Contractor’s Licence (an apprenticeship in an apprenticeship in roof tiling or Certificate III in Roof Tiling CPC30812 CPC30820) with no infringements or directions issued upon any licence held

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of investigative and inspectorate services for defective building work - Termite Chemical

If Yes Holder of a QBCC Contractor’s Licence (Termite Management – Chemical) with no infringements or directions issued upon any licence held

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of investigative and inspectorate services for defective building work - Termite Physical

If Yes Holder of a QBCC Contractor’s Licence (Termite Management – Chemical, Holder of both of the following, certification by the manufacturer of a product or system to be used by a licensee that the licensee has satisfactorily completed a course about the installation of the product or system and successful completion of the unit of competency Install physical termite management systems CPPPMT3042 from Certificate III in Urban Pest Management CPP30115) with no infringements or directions issued upon any licence held

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of investigative and inspectorate services for defective building work - Tiling

If Yes Holder of a QBCC Contractor’s Licence (Wall and Floor Tiling License) with no infringements or directions issued upon any licence held

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Are you tenderering for the supply of investigative and inspectorate services for defective building work - Waterproofing

If Yes Holder of a QBCC Contractor’s Licence (Certificate III in Construction Waterproofing CPC31411 CPC31420 or a recognition certificate as a qualified waterproofer; ) with no infringements or directions issued upon any licence held

If Yes, have you worked within the industry for a minimum of Five (5) Years;

Question:
Hi

I am a Member Illuminating Engineering Society (MIES ANZ) and Registered Lighting Practitioner with IES ANZ, and part of my business is conducting lighting audits to confirm compliance with the relevant Australian Standards.

While not specifically identified in this Tender would this be a service that would/could be included under the Tender Scope?

Thanks

Answered on 06/Feb/2026 06:05 AM:


Response:

The service is out of Scope and would not form part of the panel.

End of Response:

Question:
Are you tendering for the supply of investigative and inspection services for defective building work provided by consultancy firms, with qualifications and accreditation from industry recognised organisations? ( i.e. without a trade specific licence and without a building licence).

Answered on 09/Feb/2026 06:37 AM:


RESPONSE:

Yes

The tender includes investigative and inspection services for defective building work provided by consultancy firms that hold relevant qualifications and accreditation from industry-recognised organisations, even where those firms do not hold a trade-specific licence or a building licence, unless such a licence is legally required.

The services are investigative, advisory and reporting in nature and do not involve carrying out building or trade work. As such, they can be appropriately delivered by suitably qualified and accredited consultants who demonstrate technical competence, relevant experience and the ability to produce defensible regulatory reports. Where legislation or safety requirements mandate a specific licence for an inspection activity, only consultants holding the required licence will be engaged.

END RESPONSE:

Question:
Can you please confirm whether non-destructive testing and subsurface investigation services, including ground-penetrating radar, utility locating, and concrete scanning, fall within the scope of this Standing Offer Arrangement?

Answered on 09/Feb/2026 06:42 AM:


RESPONSE:

Yes, with limitations

Non-destructive testing and subsurface investigation services fall within the scope of this Standing Offer Arrangement where they are undertaken for the purpose of investigating and assessing defective building work, and where they directly support technical inspection, engineering assessment or regulatory reporting outcomes (for example, concrete scanning, ground-penetrating radar or utility locating to confirm as-constructed conditions or identify causes of defects).

Services that are exploratory, design-led, or delivered as standalone surveying, asset mapping or pre-construction investigations, rather than defect investigation and reporting, are not within scope.

END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
Could you please advise whether wayfinding and environmental psychology consulting services would be considered within the scope of this panel?

Answered on 09/Feb/2026 06:39 AM:


RESPONSE:

No, these services are not within scope.

END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
Are you accepting Occupational Hygiene and asbestos consultancy as part of this scope?

Answered on 09/Feb/2026 08:04 AM:


RESPONSE:

No.

END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
We are an engineering consulting firm whose scope includes electrical engineering, ICT and electronic security design, documentation, auditing and reporting services.

Does this fit within the requirements?

Thank you

Answered on 09/Feb/2026 09:37 AM:


RESPONSE:

No, not in this arrangement

END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
Are Environmental & Sustainability Services part of the services being tendered?

Answered on 10/Feb/2026 12:52 PM:


RESPONSE:

No

END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
Attachment 1 - Pricing response sheet does not have any tab for an Electrical engineering service. Please advise if electrical engineering services are not required for this SoA.

Answered on 11/Feb/2026 01:05 PM:


RESPONSE:

Electrical engineering services does not form part of the scope for this arrangement.

END OF RSPONSE:

Question:
Good afternoon

This request has been added to the architecture category though does not appear in the pricing schedule, can it be clarified whether the QBCC are seeking architecture firms to be included in the SOA. Thank you

Answered on 11/Feb/2026 03:01 PM:


RESPONSE:

Architecture is not within the scope of this agreement

END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
I am currently completing the Part C Response Schedules (Sections 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5) and note that each line item includes references to specific sections of Schedule 3.

I seek clarification regarding the intended source document for these references.

For example:

Section 6.5 – Governance, Risk and Compliance requests details of the reporting process in line with “Schedule 3 – Section 9 Governance and Reporting.” Could you please confirm whether this refers to Part B – Schedule 3, and whether this aligns with the Performance Measurement and Review provisions (for example 1.a)ix) relating to 95% of performance reports submitted on time), or whether a separate Governance and Reporting section is intended?

Section 6.5 also requests details of the internal change management process with reference to “Schedule 3 – Section 11 Change Management.” I have been unable to locate a Section 11 – Change Management within Schedule 3 and would appreciate confirmation of the correct document reference.

I may have overlooked or misinterpreted the existing documentation.

In the interim, I will continue progressing the submission and address the questions to the best of my understanding of the intended requirements. To provide a comprehensive and structured response, I propose submitting and referencing a separate “Service Proposal” document, if acceptable.

Answered on 12/Feb/2026 07:54 AM:


RESPONSE:

Part C of the tender has been reviewed following the identification of referencing errors in Sections 6.2–6.5.

A corrected version has now been released as: QBCC2026132 – Part C – Tender Response 2026 – Revised 12FEB23

Respondents must use Part C – Revised 12FEB23 for all submissions. All previous versions are withdrawn.

Tenderers are advised that any separate “Service Proposal” document will not be reviewed or considered as part of the evaluation. Only the identified Response Schedules included within the issued Part C documentation will be assessed. Any additional or supplementary documents submitted outside these schedules will be disregarded.

END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
Can we have some clarification on the meanings of a "standard investigation", "in depth investigation" and "complex investigation", in relation to the technical construction areas of the Pricing Response Schedule. Do differences relate to a minimum or maximum time spent on the inspection, or do they relate to an amount of complaint or inspection items that we are to inspect, as the number of complaints a consumer can lodge, may vary significantly between jobs, as then would the time taken to carry out the inspection?

Is a line item for "additional personnel required" possible, as some inspections may require additional personnel to comply with health and safety requirements to perform an inspection safely, or is this to be factored into the submitted total price for each job?



Is the report pricing to be based on a singular item, or is it a per complaint item basis, as the number of complaints a consumer can lodge may vary significantly between inspections, as would the time it takes to prepare each report?

Answered on 12/Feb/2026 11:54 AM:


RESPONSE:

Q1.

Can we have some clarification on the meanings of a "standard investigation", "in depth investigation" and "complex investigation", in relation to the technical construction areas of the Pricing Response Schedule.

Q1 Response

• Standard investigation – General building defects, 30 complaint items or less. (Includes limited water testing)

• In depth investigation – General building defects including testing, and matters including 31 to 100 complaint items.

• Complex investigation – Multiple areas requiring testing, complex engineering calculations (& the like), invasive inspection, and matters including over 100 complaint items.

Q2.

Do differences relate to a minimum or maximum time spent on the inspection, or do they relate to an amount of complaint or inspection items that we are to inspect, as the number of complaints a consumer can lodge, may vary significantly between jobs, as then would the time taken to carry out the inspection?

Q2 Response

• Engagements will vary dependant on complexity and number of complaint items. Noting there is no limit to the number of complaints a consumer can lodge. It is expected the vendors pricing structure will be commensurate with the above investigation categories and their expectation/commitment to the time each would take.

Q3.

Is a line item for "additional personnel required" possible, as some inspections may require additional personnel to comply with health and safety requirements to perform an inspection safely, or is this to be factored into the submitted total price for each job?

Q3 Response

• Tenderers may provide pricing for additional personnel required for specific investigation categories.

• Examples: Electrician to isolate power - $100 P/H


Carpenter for invasive inspection - $60 P/H

Q4.

Is the report pricing to be based on a singular item, or is it a per complaint item basis, as the number of complaints a consumer can lodge may vary significantly between inspections, as would the time it takes to prepare each report?

Q4 Response

• Provide pricing per report commensurate with the investigation categories provided above (standard investigation, in depth investigation & complex investigation). Additional time in unique/sporadic circumstances may be charged at a quoted hourly rate.

Q5.

Under Scope item 5: Facilitate a site meeting between consumer and respondent. Are representatives from the QBCC such as building inspectors be on site at these meetings, or will these inspections be arranged and only attended by the consultant, consumer, and respondent ?

Q5 Response

• Inspections are to be attended with the consultant, consumer, and respondent contractor. A QBCC officer may attend on occasion where circumstances require it.


END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
Good Afternoon,

Would you please be able to confirm where 'QBCC2026132 – Part C – Tender Response 2026 – Revised 12FEB23' can be located? Currently 'QBCC2026132 – Part C – Tender Response 2026 – Supply of Engineering and Trade Consulting Services' still appears under the attachments section.

Thank you.

Answered on 12/Feb/2026 11:48 AM:


RESPONSE:

It has now been released it was held up due to file name being too long which is why it has a shorter title.

END OF RESPONSE

Question:
SOA Reporting Requirements:

Please can QBCC our understanding of the below monthly reporting requirements as they pertain to the engineering services.

• Relevance of SOA vs non SOA items? – This relates to the lump sum elements of the SOA or time and expense elements. Is that interpretation correct?

• Recommended retail price or non government price – Unsure of how this is reported on and what benchmarks it relates to.

• Quantity – We interpret this to be the number of orders issued over the month?

• Product code? – Will this information be part of the work order and contract?

• Product name – As above

• Additional discounts – What additional discounts is QBCC referring to here? Is it a volume-based discount regime?

• Cashable/non-cashable savings achieve for the reporting period – Please advise what this is in relation to.

Furthermore, are monthly reports still required where there has been no work completed in the reporting month?

Please elaborate on what QBCC’s expectations are in respect of “Urgent response times” in Schedule 3. What response is required and what happens if the request is submitted after hours?

Qualifications:

Can the QBCC confirm the requirement for RPEQ qualifications for the Eng - Hydraulics category: Will a QBCC Hydraulics Designer license be sufficient?

Can the QBCC confirm the requirement for Passive Fire Inspector qualification for the Eng – Passive Fire category. Will a QBCC Hydraulics Designer License be sufficient?

Fee Clarifications:

In depth investigation requirements – It is not possible to provide a fixed fee for in-depth investigations as each defect will have different requirements for testing (eg. Core samples, water pressure testing, camera inspections) and / or engineering analysis. Please can QBCC advise what respondents should base their fee on for the in-depth testing category?

Can QBCC advise on the volume of work anticipated and will QBCC be guaranteeing a minimum quantity for panel members?

Can QBCC advise how panel members will be compensated for monthly reporting requirements? Especially if there is no guaranteed quantity of work under the panel.

What are the expected commitments for attendance at QBCC information sessions, onboarding and annual training?

Thank you.

Answered on 13/Feb/2026 10:47 AM:


RESPONSE:

Reference SOA Part B Agreement

(Schedule 4.1 SOA Reporting Requirements)

Question 1:

Relevance of SOA vs non SOA items? – This relates to the lump sum elements of the SOA or time and expense elements. Is that interpretation correct?

Question 1 Response:

SOA items are those services that fall within the approved scope of the Standing Offer Arrangement and are covered by the pricing submitted in the Attachment 1 – Pricing Response Sheet.

These services must always be delivered at SOA rates, regardless of whether the SOA number is referenced on the order.

Non SOA items are services that:

• are not included in the scope defined in Schedule 1, and

• do not have SOA pricing associated with them,

but may be requested by QBCC on an exception basis.

Where non SOA items are used, the supplier must justify why the service falls outside the SOA scope. This distinction is necessary because:

• QBCC must ensure compliance with government procurement and audit obligations.

• Non SOA expenditure must not be used to circumvent SOA pricing controls.

• SOA reporting (Schedule 4.1) separately identifies SOA and non SOA items in the mandatory Sales Report, ensuring transparency of spend.

This distinction does not relate to lump sum vs time and expense pricing. Both of those pricing structures may apply within the SOA where indicated. The SOA vs non SOA classification is strictly about whether the service is within the approved SOA scope and pricing, not about how the price is calculated.

Question 2:

Recommended retail price or non government price – Unsure of how this is reported on and what benchmarks it relates to.

Question 2 Response:

The “recommended retail price or non government price” is the supplier’s standard commercial rate for the same service when sold outside the SOA, and must be reported in the quarterly Sales Report as required in Schedule 4.1. This is simply the supplier’s usual private market rate (for example, standard hourly rates or fixed fee pricing), which is listed alongside the SOA price for each line item so QBCC can clearly compare ordinary market pricing with the negotiated SOA rate and demonstrate value for money and savings achieved.

Question 3:

Quantity – We interpret this to be the number of orders issued over the month?

Question 3 Response:

Correct

Question 4:

Product code? – Will this information be part of the work order and contract?

Question 4 Response:

Correct

Question 5:

Product name – As above

Question 5 Response:

Correct

Question 6:

Additional discounts – What additional discounts is QBCC referring to here? Is it a volume-based discount regime?

Question 6 Response:

“Additional discounts” refers to any discount the supplier chooses to offer beyond the contracted SOA price, and is not limited to volume based arrangements. Under Schedule 4.1 of the SOA reporting requirements, suppliers must disclose any such discounts, whether offered for a specific engagement, a temporary promotion, a goodwill adjustment, or any other discretionary reduction, such as “Early Payment” Discount” so QBCC can accurately capture savings and maintain transparency in SOA reporting. This is simply a reporting requirement and does not obligate suppliers to provide any additional or volume based discounts

Question 7:

Cashable/non-cashable savings achieve for the reporting period – Please advise what this is in relation to.

Question 7 Response:

“Cashable and non cashable savings” refer to the measurable benefits achieved through the SOA compared with the supplier’s standard non government pricing, as required in the quarterly Sales Report under Schedule 4.1. Cashable savings are direct financial savings, for example, the difference between the supplier’s usual commercial rate and the SOA rate actually charged. Non cashable savings capture efficiency or qualitative benefits that do not result in a direct dollar reduction but still demonstrate value, such as improved service delivery timeframes, reduced administrative effort, or enhanced compliance. Both metrics enable QBCC to evidence value for money and the benefits of using the SOA

Question 8:

Furthermore, are monthly reports still required where there has been no work completed in the reporting month?

Question 8 Response:

Yes

Question 9:

Please elaborate on what QBCC’s expectations are in respect of “Urgent response times” in Schedule 3. What response is required and what happens if the request is submitted after hours?

Question 9 Response:

“Urgent response times” in Schedule 3 refer to the supplier’s obligation to acknowledge and mobilise for urgent work within two hours, as measured from the time the request is received by the supplier, consistent with the KPI requiring 90% of urgent requests to be responded to within this timeframe. The expectation is that the supplier will promptly acknowledge the request, confirm availability, and begin arrangements to attend. If an urgent request is submitted after hours, the response time obligation applies from the moment the request is received through the supplier’s nominated after hours contact point; suppliers are required to maintain appropriate contact arrangements to ensure urgent matters can still be acknowledged and acted upon in accordance with the KPI framework.

Qualifications:

Question 10:

Can the QBCC confirm the requirement for RPEQ qualifications for the Eng - Hydraulics category: Will a QBCC Hydraulics Designer license be sufficient?

Question 10 Response:

For the Engineering – Hydraulics category, the expectation is that suppliers hold the qualifications necessary to lawfully perform the services within scope, which includes RPEQ registration where the work constitutes professional engineering services under the Professional Engineers Act. A QBCC Hydraulics Designer licence may be sufficient only where the work requested falls strictly within the permitted scope of that licence class and does not involve professional engineering services that must be undertaken or supervised by an RPEQ. Where the engagement requires engineering judgment, certification, or reporting that meets the definition of professional engineering services, RPEQ registration will still be required.

Question 11:

Can the QBCC confirm the requirement for Passive Fire Inspector qualification for the Eng – Passive Fire category. Will a QBCC Hydraulics Designer License be sufficient?

Question 11 Response:

For the Engineering – Passive Fire category, suppliers must hold the qualifications necessary to lawfully perform passive fire inspection services, which may include specific passive fire inspector competencies or accreditation where the work involves assessment against fire safety standards. A QBCC Hydraulics Designer licence is not sufficient for this category, as it does not cover passive fire systems, fire stopping elements, or inspection of fire resisting construction. Where the work meets the definition of professional engineering services under the Professional Engineers Act, it must be carried out or supervised by an appropriately registered RPEQ with relevant fire safety competence; for other inspection activities, the supplier must still demonstrate appropriate passive fire inspection qualifications aligned to the scope in Schedule?1 of the SOA.


Fee Clarifications:

Question 12:

In depth investigation requirements – It is not possible to provide a fixed fee for in-depth investigations as each defect will have different requirements for testing (eg. Core samples, water pressure testing, camera inspections) and / or engineering analysis. Please can QBCC advise what respondents should base their fee on for the in-depth testing category?

Question 12 Response:

For the “in depth investigation” category, respondents should price on a time and materials basis using their SOA schedule of rates (hourly rates for relevant roles) and list common test types (e.g., core sampling, moisture/water pressure tests, CCTV/camera inspections, laboratory analyses) as separately priced line items or suppliers may also propose an optional not to exceed cap for transparency. This approach aligns with Schedule?2 (Prices), which allows itemised, rate based pricing and requires disclosure of all fees, and with Schedule?1, which recognises varying investigative methods depending on defect type; it also preserves KPI compliance in Schedule?3 by enabling timely scoping and reporting without forcing an impractical fixed fee.

Question 13:

Can QBCC advise on the volume of work anticipated and will QBCC be guaranteeing a minimum quantity for panel members?

Question 13 Response:

QBCC does not guarantee any minimum volume of work under the SOA, and no minimum quantity or allocation is offered to panel members. As outlined in the SOA structure, work is issued based on operational need, Eligible Customer discretion, and the nature and location of individual matters. The SOA provides a mechanism for engagement but does not create an entitlement to a set number of inspections, reports, or investigations for any supplier; volume will vary depending on complaint levels, regional demand, and internal resourcing requirements

Question 14:

Can QBCC advise how panel members will be compensated for monthly reporting requirements? Especially if there is no guaranteed quantity of work under the panel.

Question 14 Response:

The SOA does not provide separate compensation for monthly or quarterly reporting, and no minimum volume of work is guaranteed to panel members. Under Schedule?4.1, the reporting requirements form part of the supplier’s contractual obligations for participation in the panel, and suppliers are expected to meet these obligations regardless of the volume of work received, as they support governance, audit compliance, and performance monitoring under the SOA. While the SOA does not mandate a reporting fee, suppliers may factor the administrative effort associated with reporting into their overall pricing structure when submitting their rates

Question 15:

What are the expected commitments for attendance at QBCC information sessions, onboarding and annual training?

Question 15 Response

Attendance at QBCC information sessions, onboarding, and annual training is an expected supplier commitment to ensure consistent service delivery and alignment with QBCC standards, as outlined in Schedule?1, which requires participation in QBCC led onboarding and annual training activities. These commitments generally involve attending virtual or in person briefings, completing any required induction modules, and participating in periodic updates on policies, reporting requirements, and technical expectations. The commitment is not anticipated to be onerous; rather, it ensures suppliers remain informed about QBCC processes, reporting, safety requirements, and service standards to maintain quality and compliance throughout the SOA term

END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
We note that the ITO requests that full insurance policies be included as an attachment to the response.

As a global company with multiple entities, our policies are complex and highly confidential. Global Group policy prevents us from sharing them externally in all jurisdictions where we operate.

We can confirm that we have, and maintain, all the requisite cover that QBCC requires in relation to the ITO for SOA of Engineering Services.

QBCC has always been satisfied with the provision of Certificates of Currency as evidence of insurance cover in the past, and we will be very happy to provide these in attachment.



Can you please confirm this will be acceptable.

Answered on 16/Feb/2026 08:52 AM:


RESPONSE:

The ITO requires suppliers to provide evidence of insurance coverage sufficient for evaluation.

While the documentation requests full insurance policies, the Principal acknowledges that some suppliers operate under global insurance frameworks that restrict the release of full policy documents.

Provision of Certificates of Currency is acceptable for the purposes of the ITO, provided that:

• The certificates clearly identify the insurer, coverage type, limits, and expiry dates.

• Coverage meets or exceeds all requirements stated in Part B – SOA Details.

• Certificates are current at the time of submission.

Full policies will not be required where Certificates of Currency provide the necessary confirmation of compliance.

END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
Good Afternoon,

Can you please clarify where one can access Section 10.4 Contingency Planning as cannot see it in Part B Agreement - Schedule 3. Schedule 3 only has 2 sections to it. Thank you.

Answered on 16/Feb/2026 08:59 AM:


RESPONSE:

The reference in Part C to “Part B Agreement – Schedule 3, Section 3 (C) Contingency Planning” directs suppliers to the Contingency Planning subsection located under Risk Management within Schedule 3 of Part B (Revised 16FEB26).

This subsection is not numbered as “10.4” in Part B. The numbering used in Part C is an internal cross reference only and does not correspond to numbering within Part B and was not meant for release.

To locate the correct section, refer to:

Part B ? Schedule 3 ? Risk Management ? (c) Contingency Planning

If this section is not visible, the document being viewed is a superseded version.

Only the Revised 16FEB26 version is current, and all previous versions are null and void.

Thank you for identifying this issue.

END OF RESPONSE

Question:
May we please seek clarification from QBCC on whether QBCC is looking for a multi-disciplinary consultant capable of providing all engineering and trade consulting services identified, or a specialist engineering consultancy is allowed to submit for a specific engineering service. Thanking you in advance.

Answered on 16/Feb/2026 10:49 AM:


RESPONSE:

QBCC can confirm that respondents are not required to be multi-disciplinary.

Specialist consultancies may submit a response for the specific engineering service(s) they are qualified to deliver.

There is no requirement to cover all engineering or trade consulting services listed.

In addition, suppliers are not required to provide services to all regions of Queensland.

You may nominate the geographic areas you can service, and responses will be considered accordingly.

END OF RESPONSE

Question:
Can you please confirm if you will accept responses from trade associations or member service models to respond to the requirements? Or are you specifically only looking to engage directly with licensed trades etc?

Answered on 16/Feb/2026 01:41 PM:


The SOA is set up for a single legal entity (“the Supplier”) to contract directly with QBCC/Eligible Customers and to be fully accountable for performance, risk, qualifications and insurance.

A trade association that is not contractually linked to (and in control of) its members cannot satisfy those obligations, because privity of contract and the SOA’s KPI, insurance and licensing requirements sit with the Supplier, not with a loose network of member firms or individuals.

If an association wishes to respond, it must do so as the Supplier of record, delivering services via its own employees or formally engaged subcontractors under the association’s contractual control, with the association’s insurances and licences covering all work (and ensuring all practitioners delivering services are appropriately qualified/licensed).

The SOA contemplates a single Supplier accountable for delivery and risk

Part B repeatedly frames obligations on “the Supplier” (a specific legal entity) for capability, insurances, qualifications, performance, reporting, and remedies.

The Customer’s orders form Contracts under the SOA with that Supplier, not with a pool of members.

Examples:

o Insurance: Supplier must hold PI (min $5m), Public & Products Liability ($20m), and other cover for the SOA term and contract terms, with Certificates of Currency provided on request. These are Supplier-level obligations, not optional pass throughs to a membership base.

o Authorisations/licences: Supplier must maintain relevant professional accreditations (e.g., RPEQ, QBCC licences) and produce evidence within five business days of commencement/on request. Again, this sits with the Supplier and those actually delivering services under its control.

o KPI accountability: On-time delivery, qualifications, insurances, urgent response times, compliance with WHS/QPP/QBCC policies, customer satisfaction, and reporting are all measured against the Supplier. Non performance triggers remedies and breach under the SOA.

Implication: If an association merely “introduces” member practitioners to QBCC (with each member working directly), there’s no single

Supplier to hold accountable for KPIs, insurance continuity, licence compliance, or rectification/remedies. That model conflicts with how orders and performance are governed under the SOA.

Privity and control problems with member networks

Under a standard association constitution, members are not agents of the association and the association is not automatically the principal of each member. Unless there are formal subcontract agreements (or employment/engagement contracts) between the association (as Supplier) and each person/entity delivering services, the association cannot:

• Commit its members to perform a particular order at a particular price/standard/timeframe;

• Enforce KPIs or rectification in line with clause based consequences; or

• Assume or backstop liability for defects/errors caused by members in the field.

The SOA makes clear that Contracts are formed using SOA ordering processes, and the Supplier is responsible for order accuracy, delivery, WHS, reporting, and complaints management/escalation.

A loose “member marketplace” cannot meet these privity/control requirements.

Subcontracting must be formal and under the Supplier’s risk umbrella

The SOA contemplates the possibility of subcontractors, but delivery via third parties must still occur under the Supplier’s umbrella (Supplier remains responsible for compliance, performance and WHS obligations).

The SOA structure and KPIs assume clear lines of accountability back to the Supplier.

Practically, that means executed subcontract agreements with flow down obligations (KPIs, WHS, privacy, complaints, audit, training, licence requirements, rectification, insurances, and data/IP handling) and oversight so that the Supplier can report and remedy as required by Schedules 3–5.

Insurance: whose policy must respond?

The SOA places explicit insurance duties on the Supplier:

• Professional Indemnity: minimum $5m, maintained for 4 years after the SOA and any Contract;

• Public & Products Liability: minimum $20m;

• Other mandatory covers (e.g., cyber, motor) as listed;

• Certificates of Currency to be furnished within five business days on request.

If an association is the Supplier of record and it deploys member practitioners as subcontractors, then the association’s insurance program must be structured to cover:

• All professional services performed under SOA orders (including work performed by subcontracted members),

• Vicarious liability exposure for subcontractors, and

• Run off obligations (PI maintained post term).

Relying solely on each member’s own PI/PL is inadequate unless the association can demonstrate:

1. Its own policies respond in the first instance or at least provide back to back coverage for subcontracted work; and

2. It has contractually enforceable requirements to verify and maintain each subcontractor’s insurance (limits, territorial/jurisdictional cover, retroactive dates, run off), with audit rights and indemnities in favour of the association/Supplier.

Without this architecture, a member’s error could leave QBCC without a clean recourse path to the Supplier and create coverage gaps or recovery complexity contrary to the SOA risk profile.

What an association must do if it wants to respond

To be eligible, a trade association would need to restructure its offer so it fits the SOA’s single Supplier model:

1. Contracting structure

o Association bids as the Supplier and signs the SOA and any orders.

o All practitioners delivering work are employees of the association or are formally subcontracted to it under executed agreements with full flow down of SOA obligations (WHS, qualifications/RPEQ, QBCC licensing, KPIs, reporting, complaints management, confidentiality/privacy, IP, rectification, audit).

2. Licences and competency

o The association ensures every individual actually performing services holds the required licences/registrations (e.g., RPEQ, QBCC licence classes) and can produce evidence within the specified timeframes;

o The association maintains a verified register of Key Personnel aligned to the SOA, with onboarding/training as required by the SOA.

3. Insurance program

o The association maintains PI = $5m and PL/Products = $20m, plus other required covers, expressly covering work of its subcontracted members (vicarious liability) and meeting the run off requirement;

o Contractually requires (and audits) subcontractor insurance to mirror or support the association’s program, with Certificates of Currency tracking and right to suspend work for non compliance.

4. Performance and governance

o The association implements systems to meet KPI reporting, urgent response, invoice accuracy, SOA reporting, complaints handling, and escalation obligations—because the Supplier is measured and sanctioned under the SOA.

If an association cannot or will not operate under this structure, then a “member referral” model (where members contract directly with QBCC) is not compatible with the SOA, because QBCC’s contract would not be with those individual members and the SOA’s accountability framework would be broken.

Question:
We note that the ITO documentation for QBCC-2026132 states that the use of subcontractors is strictly prohibited under the SOA.

We are seeking clarification on how this requirement is intended to operate in practice where inspections require specialist material testing or invasive testing services (for example, laboratory testing of samples, NATA-accredited testing, or specialist invasive investigations) that are typically undertaken by third-party providers.

In particular, could you please clarify:

1. Whether subcontractors engaged for such specialist testing are expected to be engaged directly by QBCC, rather than by the SOA supplier; or

2. Whether QBCC envisages any circumstances in which a supplier may engage specialist third parties as part of the inspection process, noting that the inspection, assessment, and reporting functions would remain the responsibility of the SOA supplier; and

3. If subcontractors are not permitted in any circumstances, how QBCC expects suppliers to manage inspections that ordinarily require specialist testing capabilities outside the supplier’s in-house resources.

Your guidance on QBCC’s expectations and preferred engagement model for these scenarios would be appreciated.

Answered on 17/Feb/2026 06:33 AM:


RESPONSE:

QBCC confirms that the SOA prohibits suppliers from using subcontractors to undertake any component of the contracted inspection, assessment, or reporting services.

Under Queensland Government procurement guidance, subcontractors are parties engaged by a supplier to perform part of the deliverables, whereas independent specialist testing providers, such as NATA-accredited laboratories, are treated differently because they supply discrete test results or technical data and do not contribute to the supplier’s inspection or reporting outputs.

Government guidance notes that third-party procurement arrangements do not include subcontractor arrangements, underscoring this distinction.

Specialist material testing, laboratory analysis, and technical investigations are often undertaken by external accredited providers.

These organisations provide raw data only, such as laboratory results or diagnostic measurements.

The SOA supplier remains solely responsible for interpreting this data, applying professional judgment, forming conclusions, and producing the final report.

Because these activities do not constitute performance of SOA deliverables, engaging such providers does not breach the subcontracting prohibition.

Accordingly, suppliers may engage specialist third-party providers solely for the purpose of obtaining raw test results or diagnostic data. The SOA supplier must at all times retain full responsibility for all inspection activities, assessment, analysis, recommendations, and reporting.

Intent of the Subcontracting Prohibition

The prohibition on subcontracting is intended to ensure that the contracted supplier performs all substantive elements of the inspection, assessment, and reporting services themselves. QBCC requires that suppliers provide genuine technical involvement and professional contribution to each engagement. It is not permissible for a supplier to transfer the inspection, assessment, or reporting functions to another entity and present that work as their own. This ensures accountability, maintains quality, and supports compliance with the Queensland Procurement Policy, which emphasises proper governance, transparency, and ethical service delivery.

Expectations for Inspections Requiring Specialist Testing

For inspections that require specialist testing capabilities beyond the supplier’s internal resources, QBCC expects suppliers to:

• identify the type of testing required;

• engage appropriately qualified external testing providers only to obtain raw data or laboratory results; and

• integrate those results into their own professional assessment and final report.

This approach maintains compliance with the subcontracting prohibition while recognising that some investigations necessitate the use of accredited testing services that cannot reasonably be performed in-house.

END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
Good afternoon,

We are currently preparing our submission for the QBCC panel and are reviewing the Pricing Guide section.

In previous submissions, we have provided location-based fee schedules (for example, separate rates for Brisbane, the Gold Coast and North Queensland). We are unable to locate a section within VendorPanel to input this information.

Could you please confirm whether we should include our location-based pricing schedule as an additional attachment with the tender submission?

Answered on 18/Feb/2026 07:00 AM:


RESPONSE:

To clarify, for this tender you do not upload a separate location-based pricing schedule.

All pricing must be entered directly into Attachment 1 – Pricing Response Schedule (the Excel workbook supplied with the ITO).

VendorPanel does not provide an upload field for alternative pricing formats because the Principal requires all pricing to be standardised and captured within this specific workbook.

Where to enter your location-based pricing

Your location-based rates are entered within Tabs 7 through 25 of the Pricing Response Schedule.

Each of these tabs corresponds to a separate discipline or service category (e.g. Acoustic Engineer, Building CUT, Building Services Engineer, Fire Engineer, Plumbing & Drainage, Waterproofing, etc.).

Inside each tab you will find:

Ability to Service (yellow cells)

You must select Yes or No for each region:

• All Regions

• Metropolitan

• South East Queensland

• North Coast

• Darling Downs & South West

• Central Queensland

• North & North West Queensland

• Far North Queensland & Thursday Island

These fields indicate where you can provide services and must be completed before entering prices.

Pricing Table (blue cells)

Beneath the service description, you will see blue-shaded cells for each region.

These are where you enter your fee schedule for that service category.

The pricing items include:

• Rates (base rate)

• Standard Investigation

• In-depth Investigation

• Complex Investigation

• Report Writing and Submission

• Additional Investigation

• Fixed Hourly Rate (ad hoc)

• Fixed Hourly Rate – Technical Director / Principal / Associate / Senior Consultant / Project Consultant

These cells accept numeric values in AUD, excluding GST, as outlined in the Explanatory Notes.

How this replaces your previous location-based pricing approach

In prior tenders, you may have supplied separate location-based schedules (e.g. Brisbane, Gold Coast, North Queensland).

This process has been replaced by the standardised regional structure built into each pricing tab.

The eight regions listed reflect the Commission’s operating areas and allow your pricing variation to be captured consistently across all suppliers.

Important compliance note

The workbook’s instructions emphasise that tenderers must not:

• add rows or columns

• alter the structure

• attach substitute pricing documents

Offers that modify the workbook structure are considered non-compliant.

All required fields (yellow and blue cells) must be completed within the provided templates only.

Summary

Yes: you can provide region-specific rates, but only by entering them into the blue pricing cells within Tabs 7–25.

No: you should not attach a separate document containing location-based pricing, as this is outside the required format.

END OF RESPONSE:

Question:
Question 1:

The Pricing Response Schedule refers to a Standard Investigation for plumbing and/or roofing consultant services, noting that such investigations may involve a varying number of complaint items within the defined category.

The response lodged on 12 February 2026 11:54 notes in question 2: “Engagements will vary dependant on complexity and number of complaint items. Noting there is no limit to the number of complaints a consumer can lodge. It is expected the vendors pricing structure will be commensurate with the above investigation categories and their expectation/commitment to the time each would take”.

We interpret this to mean that:

• pricing for a Standard Investigation is to be submitted as a single fixed fee per engagement, and

• that this fixed fee applies irrespective of the number of complaint items assessed, provided they fall within the Standard Investigation category.

a) Can the QBCC please confirm whether this understanding is correct?

b) If not, and pricing is intended to vary based on the number of complaint or inspection items assessed, could the QBCC please advise how tenderers are expected to reflect this variability within the Pricing Response Schedule?


Question 2:

The response issued on 12 February 2026 (11:54 AM, Question 3) confirms that tenderers may provide pricing for additional personnel required for specific investigation categories.

Further, the response issued on 13 February 2026 (10:47 AM, Question 12) notes that tenderers may list common test types (e.g. CCTV inspections, laboratory analysis, water pressure testing) as separately priced line items.

However, the response issued on 18 February 2026 (7:00 AM) states that tenderers must not add rows or columns, alter the workbook structure, or attach alternative pricing documents.

Could the QBCC please provide guidance on:

a) where and how tenderers are expected to reflect pricing for additional personnel or diagnostic activities within the existing Pricing Response Schedule to remain compliant; and

b) whether comments or explanatory notes may be added within cells of the workbook to clarify how such pricing is intended to be applied?

If possible, one or two practical examples would be appreciated.


Question 3:

For the Plumbing and Drainage category, could the QBCC please clarify whether specialist diagnostic activities such as CCTV inspections, hydrostatic testing, and high-pressure water jetting are intended to be:

• charged separately on a time and materials basis using the SOA schedule of rates; or

• included within the pricing for the in-depth or complex investigation categories?


Question 4:

Section 3, schedule 1, point 11, notes area of supply is to be… The geographical boundaries of Regions are identified as the Department of ...insert name of Department... regions found at ....Insert Link

To assist with pricing accuracy and consistency, could the QBCC please confirm whether there are defined regional boundaries that tenderers should use for the regions listed in the Pricing Response Schedule, or provide a reference or link to the Queensland Government source that should be relied upon? For example, the approximate borders expected for “south east”, “north coast” and “darling downs and south west” etc.

Answered on 20/Feb/2026 01:37 PM:


INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT – CHANGE AUTHORISED BY QBCC

QBCC has reviewed supplier feedback and acknowledges that the current Pricing Response Schedule (Attachment?1) does not contain dedicated lines for pricing specialist diagnostic activities, plant/equipment usage, or other discrete investigation related services.

Given the specialised nature of many engineering and trade categories, particularly plumbing, roofing, hydraulic, geotechnical, structural and fire systems—QBCC recognises that suppliers require a compliant mechanism to disclose these costs in a transparent, comparable, and auditable format, consistent with Part?B, Schedule?2 (Price and Payment Terms).

Although the Attachment?1 workbook normally prohibits structural changes (“do not change the format or structure… unless stated”), QBCC has determined that it is in the best interests of pricing accuracy, fairness and evaluation integrity to explicitly authorise suppliers to insert clearly defined additional Item Numbers for specialist equipment and services.

Accordingly, QBCC hereby authorises the following:

Suppliers may insert additional pricing rows, beginning at Item?13, directly beneath Item?12 on each discipline pricing tab in Attachment?1, for the sole purpose of listing specialist equipment, diagnostic activities, or investigation related services not captured in Items?1–12.

This authorisation is issued under the “unless stated” clause and applies uniformly to all tenderers.

To maintain structural integrity and ensure evaluation comparability:

• Only new rows immediately beneath Item?12 may be added.

• Each new row must be sequentially numbered Item?13, Item?14, Item?15…

• No columns may be added or deleted.

• Column K may be used to provide descriptive notes and assumptions.

• Existing items (1–12) must not be altered.

• No other part of the workbook may be structurally modified.

This approach provides the necessary flexibility for suppliers to disclose specialist activities while preserving consistent workbook architecture across all offers.



RESPONSE:



Question 1:

The Pricing Response Schedule refers to a Standard Investigation for plumbing and/or roofing consultant services, noting that such investigations may involve a varying number of complaint items within the defined category.

The response lodged on 12 February 2026 11:54 notes in question 2: “Engagements will vary dependant on complexity and number of complaint items. Noting there is no limit to the number of complaints a consumer can lodge. It is expected the vendors pricing structure will be commensurate with the above investigation categories and their expectation/commitment to the time each would take”.

We interpret this to mean that:

• pricing for a Standard Investigation is to be submitted as a single fixed fee per engagement, and

• that this fixed fee applies irrespective of the number of complaint items assessed, provided they fall within the Standard Investigation category.

a) Can the QBCC please confirm whether this understanding is correct?

b) If not, and pricing is intended to vary based on the number of complaint or inspection items assessed, could the QBCC please advise how tenderers are expected to reflect this variability within the Pricing Response Schedule?

Response – Question 1

a) Confirmation of interpretation, QBCC confirms the interpretation is partially correct.

A Standard Investigation must be priced as a single fixed fee per engagement, consistent with the requirement in Part?B Schedule?2 to disclose the pricing method and provide fully itemised fees.

However, the fixed fee does not imply an unlimited number of complaint items. The fee reflects the supplier’s expected effort for a standard investigation under typical conditions.

b) How to reflect pricing variability

Given the need to disclose additional costs while preserving workbook structure, suppliers must:

• Enter fixed fee prices for Standard, In Depth and Complex Investigations in Items?2–4.

• Disclose any variable, complaint item dependent, or specialist service pricing using the now authorised Item Numbers 13 onwards.

Examples of costs that may be placed in Items?13+ include:

• Specialist diagnostic procedures

• Special equipment usage

• Additional laboratory or materials charges

• Any cost drivers not represented in Items?1–12

All inclusions or thresholds must be clearly stated in Column K.



Question 2:

The response issued on 12 February 2026 (11:54 AM, Question 3) confirms that tenderers may provide pricing for additional personnel required for specific investigation categories.

Further, the response issued on 13 February 2026 (10:47 AM, Question 12) notes that tenderers may list common test types (e.g. CCTV inspections, laboratory analysis, water pressure testing) as separately priced line items.

However, the response issued on 18 February 2026 (7:00 AM) states that tenderers must not add rows or columns, alter the workbook structure, or attach alternative pricing documents.

Could the QBCC please provide guidance on:

a) where and how tenderers are expected to reflect pricing for additional personnel or diagnostic activities within the existing Pricing Response Schedule to remain compliant; and

b) whether comments or explanatory notes may be added within cells of the workbook to clarify how such pricing is intended to be applied?

If possible, one or two practical examples would be appreciated.

Response – Question 2

(a) Where to insert pricing for additional personnel or diagnostic activities

Suppliers must continue to use:

• Items?7–12 for hourly rate personnel

• Item?6 for “Additional Investigation if Requested” where appropriate

• Items?13 onward (supplier added rows now authorised) for specialist equipment, specialist tests, diagnostic procedures, or other discrete priced services

This ensures that all tenderers present specialist pricing in a consistent, evaluable format while complying with Part?B Schedule?2 price disclosure requirements.

(b) Use of Column?K

Suppliers may enter explanatory notes in Column?K on any pricing row, including Items?13+. Column?K is an existing editable field and using it does not modify the workbook’s structure.

Notes may describe:

• Inclusions/exclusions

• Unit rate assumptions

• When a specialist charge applies

• Diagnostic methodology or constraints

No embedded tables or attachments may be placed in Column?K.

The following examples illustrate exactly how suppliers should complete Attachment?1 when adding pricing for additional personnel, diagnostic services, or specialist equipment while keeping the workbook compliant.

Example 1 – Plumbing & Drainage (Tab 17)

Scenario: CCTV, hydrostatic testing and jetting are required occasionally.

Blue pricing fields (existing)

• Item?2 – Standard Investigation: $X

• Item?6 – Additional Investigation if Requested: $Y

• Item?7 – Fixed Hourly Rate – Technical Director: $A

• Item?12 – Fixed Hourly Rate – Project Consultant: $B

New specialist rows (authorised)

Item?13 – CCTV Drain Inspection – per metre: $C

Item?14 – Hydrostatic Pressure Test – per test: $D

Item?15 – High pressure Water Jetting – per hour: $E

Column?K (text only explanation)

“Specialist diagnostics (Items?13–15) billed only when pre approved by QBCC. Standard Investigation excludes these diagnostics. CCTV priced per metre (minimum 10?m). Hydrostatic test includes sealing and filling. Jetting charged per hour of active use.”

Example 2 – Roofing – Metal (Tab 19)

Scenario: Certain roof inspections above 9.5?m require specialised access equipment and additional personnel.

Blue pricing fields (existing)

• Item?3 – In Depth Investigation: $X

• Item?7 – Fixed Hourly Rate – Technical Director: $A

• Item?11 – Fixed Hourly Rate – Senior Consultant: $B

New specialist rows (authorised)

Item?13 – Rope Access Kit (per site attendance): $C

Item?14 – Elevated Work Platform Hire (per day): $D

Item?15 – Height Safety Spotter (per attendance): $E

Column?K explanation

“Items?13–15 apply only to inspections requiring access above 9.5?m or where safe access cannot be achieved by ladder. Supplier to seek QBCC approval before incurring hire or specialist access costs.”

Example 3 – Structural / Civil (Tab 21)

Scenario: Geotechnical probes, crack monitoring gauges and moisture instrumentation may be required.

Blue pricing fields (existing)

• Item?4 – Complex Investigation: $X

• Item?10 – Fixed Hourly Rate – Associate: $A

New specialist rows (authorised)

Item?13 – Crack Monitor Gauge (per installation): $B

Item?14 – Moisture Probe Test (per test): $C

Item?15 – DCP (Dynamic Cone Penetrometer) Test – per test: $D

Column?K explanation

“Items?13–15 represent optional specialist testing undertaken only where authorised by QBCC or required to determine cause-of-failure. Results reported in accordance with QBCC requirements.”

Example 4 – Fire Engineering (Tab 10)

Scenario: Some assessments require smoke test devices or air flow measurement equipment.

Blue pricing fields (existing)

• Item?2 – Standard Investigation: $X

• Item?5 – Report Writing and Submission: $Y

• Item?12 – Fixed Hourly Rate – Project Consultant: $Z

New specialist rows (authorised)

Item?13 – Smoke Generation Test (per test): $A

Item?14 – Air Flow Measurement, per duct/outlet: $B

Column?K explanation

“Items?13–14 are used only where diagnostic testing is required to confirm compliance with NCC performance provisions. Not included in any fixed investigation fee.”

Key Principles Across All Examples

These practical examples demonstrate:

1. Items?7–12 remain the only locations for additional personnel hourly rates.

2. Items?13 onward (supplier inserted rows) are used for specialist equipment, diagnostic services, and investigation related discrete items.

3. Column?K must always be used to explain how each specialist item applies.

4. The workbook structure, headings, and columns remain untouched, only new rows beneath Item?12 are added.

5. Pricing remains fully transparent, allowing QBCC to compare suppliers on equal footing.



Question 3:

For the Plumbing and Drainage category, could the QBCC please clarify whether specialist diagnostic activities such as CCTV inspections, hydrostatic testing, and high-pressure water jetting are intended to be:

• charged separately on a time and materials basis using the SOA schedule of rates; or

• included within the pricing for the in-depth or complex investigation categories?


Response Question 3

QBCC confirms that specialist diagnostic activities for Plumbing and Drainage, such as CCTV inspections, hydrostatic/pressure testing, and high pressure water jetting, are not included by default in Standard, In Depth or Complex Investigation fees.

Suppliers must disclose these activities as separate priced items under the authorised Item?13+ rows, with:

• A descriptor

• A unit of measure (e.g., per test, per metre, per hour)

• A unit price

• Any explanatory comments in Column?K

Alternatively, a supplier may elect to include a diagnostic within Items?2–4 (fixed fee categories), but this must be explicitly stated in Column?K to ensure transparency.



Question 4:

Section 3, schedule 1, point 11, notes area of supply is to be… The geographical boundaries of Regions are identified as the Department of ...insert name of Department... regions found at ....Insert Link

To assist with pricing accuracy and consistency, could the QBCC please confirm whether there are defined regional boundaries that tenderers should use for the regions listed in the Pricing Response Schedule, or provide a reference or link to the Queensland Government source that should be relied upon? For example, the approximate borders expected for “south east”, “north coast” and “darling downs and south west” etc.


Response Question 4

QBCC confirms that suppliers must rely on established Queensland Government administrative regions when determining pricing by region.

The most appropriate and directly aligned references for the region names used in Attachment?1 (e.g., South East, North Coast, Darling Downs South West) are the Department of Education Queensland Region Maps, providing authoritative statewide regional boundaries updated 29?January?2026.

Official reference:

https://education.qld.gov.au/contact-us/region-maps

These boundaries ensure consistency, accuracy and comparability across all supplier submissions.

Assumptions regarding partial coverage or operational limitations may be stated in Column?K.



Final Summary

QBCC now formally authorises suppliers to add Item Numbers 13+ directly beneath Item?12 within each pricing tab, for disclosure of specialist equipment, diagnostic procedures, and other discrete services.

This decision ensures transparent, complete pricing while maintaining strict structural integrity across all submissions.

END OF RESPONSE